Panel just stepped in
Judge
Good morning all
Clerk
Ept/gov/rv/04/2015
Between Hon.Dr.Dakuku Peterside and INEC,Wike and PDP.
Petitioner rep by Achi Wobodo
2nd respondent rep by Benjamin Eke Esq
Appearances
Petitioner
S.A Oke Esq
1st respondent
Tobechukwu Nweke Esq
2nd respondent
O.Wali SAN
3rd respondent Chris Uche SAN
Judge
This our judgement
Reading the petitioner prayers. And what happened from the beginning to the ept to date
Reading the defence of the 2nd respondent
Reading the defence of the 3rd respondent.
Reading the final address of all counsels to the case.
Judge
Good morning all
Clerk
Ept/gov/rv/04/2015
Between Hon.Dr.Dakuku Peterside and INEC,Wike and PDP.
Petitioner rep by Achi Wobodo
2nd respondent rep by Benjamin Eke Esq
Appearances
Petitioner
S.A Oke Esq
1st respondent
Tobechukwu Nweke Esq
2nd respondent
O.Wali SAN
3rd respondent Chris Uche SAN
Judge
This our judgement
Reading the petitioner prayers. And what happened from the beginning to the ept to date
Reading the defence of the 2nd respondent
Reading the defence of the 3rd respondent.
Reading the final address of all counsels to the case.
The letter of the INEC Secretary on the use of the Card Reader is upheld
To the gubernatorial elections
And house of assembly
Because the letter was written twice and re emphasized
As guidelines to the said elections
As such the 1st respondent was emphatic on the usage of card reader
To the gubernatorial elections
And house of assembly
Because the letter was written twice and re emphasized
As guidelines to the said elections
As such the 1st respondent was emphatic on the usage of card reader
The use of card reader was introduced this 2015,and was emphatically said to be used only and the letter was written twice for (emphasis)
The card readers was a complimentary to the voters registers
I therefore say without the use of card reader makes the election a nullity.
The card readers was a complimentary to the voters registers
I therefore say without the use of card reader makes the election a nullity.
The DW 1 testimony was not credible
DW 1 of the 1st respondent
Because he contradicted itself
DW 2 was also did same
And further compounded her issue by saying she couldn't see or read from the form EC8A.
All the DW refused to read from INEC documents presented to them
Thereby contradicting there earlier submission.
DW 1 of the 1st respondent
Because he contradicted itself
DW 2 was also did same
And further compounded her issue by saying she couldn't see or read from the form EC8A.
All the DW refused to read from INEC documents presented to them
Thereby contradicting there earlier submission.
Even an INEC commissioner agreed that card reader was agreed to be used only in the gubernatorial and house of assembly elections
The petitioner has credible evidences
The petitioner has credible evidences
0 comments